Since one form or another of the “intelligent design” argument is from at least the Middle Ages, I would be disappointed if it were not included in a philosophy class. I would support parents who ...

After a searching review of the record and applicable case law, we find that while intelligent design arguments may be true, a proposition on which the Court takes no position, intelligent design is ...

A federal judge in Pennsylvania will hear arguments Monday in a lawsuit that both sides say could set the fundamental ground rules for how American students are taught the origins of life for years to ...

In a broad and withering opinion, a federal judge ruled last month that intelligent design was nothing more than creationism in disguise and that it was therefore unconstitutional to teach it in a ...

When federal Judge John E. Jones III handed down his decision in Kitzmiller v. Dover in December, 2005, I experienced a considerable sense of relief, if not jubilation, that a challenge to the ...

Scientists who teach evolution sometimes feel as if they are trapped in an old horror film -- the kind where the monster is killed repeatedly, only to come to life in a nastier form each time. Since ...

The point about publishing an article, making it a technical case for intelligent design is that this is a new argument. This is a new argument based on new discoveries that have taken place in the ...

It’s been a long time since I graduated law school and was admitted to the bar, and I’ve surely forgotten more than I remember. But here’s one bit of legal street-smarts I’ve retained: if you’re a ...

Re “Judge Says ‘Intelligent Design’ Is Not Science,” Dec. 21 U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III correctly ruled that “intelligent design” is a theological argument, not science. In his ruling, he ...